Listen to this article:
Abstract: Recent advancements in neuroscience reveal striking parallels between brain development and organizational dynamics, challenging traditional hierarchical structures in favor of self-organizing systems. This article examines how the brain's natural development through synaptic pruning—where initial neural overconnections are refined through experience—provides a compelling model for organizational design. By exploring principles like redundancy enabling emergence, experience-driven organization, and continuous adaptation, the article demonstrates how organizations can foster environments where innovation emerges organically rather than through top-down control. Drawing from neurobiological insights, the paper presents strategies for cultivating self-organized teams, including establishing diverse networks, encouraging experimentation, designing flexible environments, integrating real-world feedback, and embracing learning mindsets. Case studies from Amazon and ING Bank illustrate successful implementations of these principles, suggesting that organizations functioning as complex adaptive systems may better navigate today's dynamic markets.
Advancements in neuroscience are revealing insights into how the human brain develops through a process of self-organization. Traditionally, organizations have been structured in a top-down, hierarchical manner with strict divisions of labor. However, new understandings from neurobiology suggest alternative models that better leverage the innate human tendencies towards self-directed learning and emergent problem-solving.
Today we will examine key principles of how the brain self-organizes and draws parallels for how organizations can cultivate environments where teams and individuals continuously improve through an organic process of collaborative exploration and adaptation.
Self-Organization in the Developing Brain
During early brain development, neurons rapidly form new connections through a self-organized process known as synaptic pruning. Initially, the brain overproduces synaptic connections in a disorganized manner. Through interactions with the environment, necessary connections are strengthened while weaker connections are eliminated. This allows the brain to dynamically reorganize itself to be optimally wired for the tasks and experiences it commonly encounters (Kandel et al., 2013). Several implications arise from this that translate to organizational learning.
Redundancy Enables Emergence: The brain's initial disorganized overproduction of connections provides redundancy, which enables useful connections and networks to spontaneously emerge based on experiences. Without this excess capacity, the brain would be unable to self-organize and would instead rely solely on its initial wiring. Similarly, organizations need slack resources and bandwidth for new useful solutions to emerge organically from experimentation rather than being designed in a top-down manner (Snowden & Boone, 2007).
Interaction and Experience Drive Organization: Pruning in the brain is experience-dependent—neurons that fire together wire together. Conversely, unused connections are weakened and eliminated. Likewise, organizational learning emerges from the interactions teams and individuals have with customers, challenges, and each other. Opportunities to apply knowledge through diverse experiences are required to determine what approaches are most effective (von Krogh et al., 2000).
Self-Organization is an Ongoing Process: Interestingly, some synaptic pruning continues into adulthood, demonstrating that the brain remains adaptable. Continuous refinement occurs as new skills are learned and environments change. Similarly, the challenges organizations face evolve over time, necessitating an ongoing cycle of exploration, learning, and recalibration, rather than a single period of design (Nonaka, 1994).
Fostering Emergence in Organizations
Drawing from these findings in neuroscience, several approaches can help cultivate environments conducive to the ongoing self-organization and improvement seen in the brain. Appropriate structures, resources, and mindsets can leverage natural collaborative tendencies rather than relying solely on rigid control mechanisms.
Establish Diverse, Interconnected Networks: The overconnected redundancy present in early brain development that enables emergence parallels the rich interconnectivity found in high-performing teams and organizations. Establishing communities of interest across silos and roles breaks down barriers limiting interactions. Innovation stems from diverse perspectives collaborating in fluid, cross-functional networks (Page, 2008).
Seed Opportunities for Experiments: Providing some slack for exploratory "play" allows useful solutions to emerge organically rather than being specified top-down. Leaders can seed small, safe-to-fail experiments granting autonomy to pursue hunches. Learning accelerates as teams iteratively test, apply feedback, and self-organize approaches—strengthening successful connections (McGrath, 2011).
Design Environments, Not Detailed Plans: Rather than rigid structures with strict plans, empower teams with flexibility within clear constraints tailored around customer problems. Purpose and principles provide just enough organization for self-directed groups to emerge tailored solutions through interactive specialization as needed (Snowden & Boone, 2007).
Build Customer Immersion and Real-World Feedback: Hands-on experience applying ideas in authentic contexts, with rapid feedback, drives the type of interaction necessary for continuous self-organization, as seen in brain development. Rotations, codeployments, and other opportunities to directly engage customers accelerate learning and refinement of approaches (Brown & Duguid, 1991).
Cultivate a Learning Mindset: A focus on growth over fixed processes encourages ongoing questioning and adaptation. This developmental viewpoint parallels the malleability of synaptic connections in the brain. Leaders model curiosity, transparency about uncertainties, and view “failures” as learning (De Geus, 1988; Senge et al., 1994).
Industry Application
Case Study: Product Development at Amazon" An exemplar of fostering emergent solutions is Amazon's approach to product development. Cross-functional teams have autonomy within guidelines to experiment rapidly. Innovations that gain customer traction organically draw more investment to iteratively improve through real-world usage data. Other ideas that don't pan out are terminated quickly through this continual feedback loop (Neustaedter, 2017). Redundancy is built into Amazon's portfolio strategy specifically to seed many ideas, allowing the most solutions to emerge and strengthening the best connections organically over time (Ismail, 2014).
Case Study: agile Transformation at ING Bank: ING Bank implemented agile ways of working across its lines of business to drive more emergent, customer-centric solutions. Self-organizing squads formed around end-user problems versus organizational silos. Continuous experimentation, flexible structures, and regular feedback through sprints and codeployments led to adaptability as customer and marketplace needs changed rapidly. A focus on learning from failures drove ongoing improvement through a more neurological model of trying many ideas and strengthening the most effective connections collaboratively (Kniberg & Ivarsson, 2012).
Conclusion
Applying principles from neuroscience offers new ways for organizations to foster continuous learning and improvement. Traditional pre-planned change initiatives can be supplemented by cultivating environments where useful solutions emerge organically through interactive specialization and diversity and experimentation within clear constraints. Redundancy, experience, ongoing adaptation and refinement are keys to both brain development and high performance in dynamic markets. Viewing organizations as complex adaptive systems that self-organize parallels the latest understandings from neurobiology. Leaders can seed opportunities, establish rich interconnectivity, and develop mindsets attuned to an ongoing cycle of exploration, application, feedback and recalibration.
References
Brown, S. L., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40-57.
De Geus, A. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard business review, 66(2), 70-74.
Ismail, S., Malone, M. S., & Van Geest, Y. (2014). Exponential organizations. Diversion Books.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S. A., & Hudspeth, A. J. (Eds.). (2013). Principles of neural science (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Kniberg, H., & Ivarsson, A. (2012). Scaling agile @ Spotify. Spotify.
McGrath, R. G. (2011). Fail fast, learn faster: Lessons in product management from Amazon, Google, and Microsoft for startup success. Dreamit Ventures.
Neustaedter, C. (2017, January 12). How Amazon develops products. Medium.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.
Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press.
Senge, P. M., Robert, C. S. C., Kleiner, A., Ross, R. B., Roth, G., & Smith, B. (1999). Dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. Currency
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard business review, 85(11), 68.
Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. Oxford university press.
Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.
Suggested Citation: Westover, J. H. (2025). The Neuroscience of Self-Organization: Implications for Fostering Continuous Improvement in Organizations. Human Capital Leadership Review, 19(3). doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.19.3.1
