By Jonathan H. Westover, PhD
Listen to this article:
Abstract: This research brief examines the influence of workload and work environment on employee job satisfaction. Job satisfaction is an important driver of retention, productivity and organizational success, yet the specific factors that impact it are complex. The brief reviews literature regarding the quantitative and qualitative aspects of workload, including volume, demands, controllability, and their mixed effects on satisfaction depending on employee and job characteristics. Key dimensions of the work environment explored are physical conditions, social interactions, and organizational culture. An integrated approach is proposed to balance workload challenges with support mechanisms and control. Practical recommendations are provided for workload distribution, flexible work arrangements, team collaboration, ergonomic workspace, communication, and satisfaction measurement. The brief synthesizes knowledge on workload, environment and satisfaction to inform human resource practices aimed at fostering engagement and performance.
Job satisfaction has long been recognized as a crucial factor for employee retention, productivity, and organizational success (Spector, 1997). Understanding what drives job satisfaction is therefore important for managing human capital effectively. Previous research has identified workload and work environment as key determinants of employee satisfaction (O’Driscoll & Beehr, 1994; Zeffane & Conway, 2017). However, the nature of their influence is complex, with mixed evidence on how factors like workload volume, job demands, and environmental conditions differentially impact satisfaction (Johari et al., 2018).
Through a synthesis and analysis of existing scholarly literature, this research brief aims to provide clarity on the relationship between workload, work environment, and job satisfaction. Specific objectives are to:
Examine how quantitative and qualitative aspects of workload impact employee satisfaction.
Analyze how key dimensions of the work environment like physical conditions, social interactions, and organizational culture shape satisfaction levels.
Discuss practical implications and provide recommendations for optimizing workload and workplace factors to enhance satisfaction.
The brief adopts a rigorous research-based approach, utilizing internal citations to establish credible evidence. By distilling current knowledge on this topic, insights will be offered to inform human resource management practices toward fostering higher employee retention and organizational performance.
Literature Review
Workload: Quantity vs. Quality
The volume of work alone does not necessarily determine job satisfaction levels. Studies show qualitative aspects of workload like job demands and complexity are also influential (O'Driscoll & Beehr, 1994; Spector, 1997). Workload quantity has mixed effects depending on characteristics of the employee and job role (Johari et al., 2018). For roles requiring critical thinking, high workloads can enhance learning and stimulate employees intrinsically (Karanika-Murray & Weyman, 2013). However, very heavy workloads stretching available resources tend to reduce satisfaction due to excessive pressure and stress (Lings & Greenley, 2005).
Workload quality refers to demands placed on employees' cognitive, emotional, and physical resources (Spector & Jex, 1998). Higher job demands associated with responsibilities like solving problems, meeting deadlines, and interacting with customers or clients are linked to lower satisfaction when demands exceed abilities or support (De Sivatte et al., 2015; Pendleton & Furnham, 2012). The relationship is moderated by factors like skill variety, autonomy, and feedback, with supportive mechanisms mitigating strain from demanding roles (Peterson et al., 1995).
Workload Controllability
Having control over the pace and organization of work aids in managing workload and enhances satisfaction (O'Driscoll & Beehr, 1994). Higher controllability buffers employees from negative effects of quantity and demands by allowing autonomy in prioritizing tasks and allocating time and effort efficiently (Spector & Jex, 1998). Demanding roles requiring problem-solving are associated with higher satisfaction when employees have discretion over workflow (Leong & crossman, 1996). Lack of control, on the other hand, correlates with reduced satisfaction due to lower autonomy and perceptions of being overwhelmed (Lings & Greenley, 2005).
Work Environment - Physical Conditions
The physical work setting influences employee satisfaction through ambient factors like noise levels, lighting, aesthetics, workspace size, availability of facilities, and ergonomic design (Leong & Crossman, 1996; Pejtersen et al., 2010). Unfavorable conditions are linked to reduced well-being and higher strain (Leblebici, 2012). For roles requiring concentration, quiet and well-lit private spaces provide stimulation while limiting distractions (Oldham & Fried, 2016). Access to breakrooms, lunch areas, and amenities supports basic human needs and contributes positively to satisfaction (Daniels, 2000). Standards of ergonomic safety also dictate physical and mental health on the job (Pejtersen et al., 2010).
Social Interactions
Relationships with colleagues and management significantly impact employee satisfaction (Zeffane & Conway, 2017). Positive social environments characterized by cooperation, support, respect, and healthy communication foster higher satisfaction through social integration and cohesion (Oldham & Brass, 1979; Spector, 1997). On the other hand, interpersonal conflict, lack of recognition, and unsupportive supervision are tied to reduced satisfaction due to strain from poor relations (West & Rushton, 1989). Peer and manager support act as buffers helping manage demands from workload and mitigating work-related stress and pressure (Pejtersen et al., 2010).
Organizational Culture
Core attributes of organizational culture, like stability, fairness, ethos, and vision also shape employee experiences and level of satisfaction (Daniels, 2000; Karanika-Murray & Weyman, 2013). Healthy cultures maintaining just practices, clear direction, an inspiring mission and values, and consistent administration of policies boost morale, motivation, and overall well-being on the job (Johari et al., 2018; Zeffane & Conway, 2017). Dysfunctional cultures marked by poor communication, inconsistent policies, lack of direction or unfair practices tend to correlate negatively with satisfaction due to confusion, insecurity and perceptions of disorder (Johari et al., 2018; Spector, 1997).
Discussion and Recommendations
Optimizing workload and work environment factors requires considering their synergistic effects on satisfaction. An integrated approach balancing quantitative and qualitative workload aspects while enhancing support mechanisms and control aids in managing demands sustainably without overburdening resources (Peterson et al., 1995; Spector & Jex, 1998). Specifically:
Distribute workload evenly according to abilities while ensuring variety and opportunities for development through challenging responsibilities. Monitor volume regularly to avoid overload.
Design autonomous, flexible roles that empower employees in navigating demands and organizing workflow efficiently according to priorities. Limit strict controls that curb discretion.
Foster social cohesion with team-building activities promoting collaboration, mutual understanding and respectful relations. Recognize contributions to boost morale.
Cultivate supportive leadership focused on employee well-being through open communication, fair treatment and consideration of work-life balance. Address concerns promptly to limit strain.
Maintain physical conditions adhering to ergonomic standards with adequate facilities for rejuvenation. Optimize layout for productivity while shielding from excess ambient distractions.
Establish stability and clarity within the broader organizational culture through consistent policies, ethical practices, transparent communication of vision and values to motivate effort amid challenges.
Regular assessment of both objective load factors and subjective experiences allows proactively adjusting practices as needs and priorities evolve over time toward sustaining high satisfaction conducive to retention and organizational performance (Spector, 1997). An engaged workforce optimally utilizing its skills and thriving amid supportive conditions remains key.
Practical Application
Drawing from insights discussed, managers can take the following steps to foster higher job satisfaction through workload and environmental factors:
Conduct periodic employee surveys to understand quantitative and qualitative workload impacts. Use feedback to redistribute work or modify responsibilities as needed to balance challenges and talents.
Implement flexible work arrangements when feasible like adjustable schedules, remote work options and compressed workweeks. Autonomy supports managing demands (Peterson et al., 1995).
Promote collaboration and recognition within teams. For example, implement regular achievement-sharing activities to boost connections and highlight contributions maintaining positive relations central to satisfaction (Oldham & Brass, 1979).
Provide ergonomic equipment and workspace organization assessing individual physical and psychological needs. Adjust as necessary through open communication (Pejtersen et al., 2010).
Communicate regularly on organizational objectives, values and progress bolstering stability and commitment amid uncertainties or difficulties. Link efforts to a compelling vision inspiring enthusiasm for the job (Johari et al., 2018).
Establish feedback mechanisms for concerns regarding workload, relationships, resources or culture facilitating prompt resolution of issues to limit strain on well-being and morale.
Measure satisfaction routinely evaluating factor impacts, retention rates and productivity guiding continuous self-improvement balancing challenges and supports to sustain engaged talent (Spector, 1997).
Conclusion
Workload quantity, demands, control and work environmental conditions substantially shape employee job satisfaction. An integrated approach considers synergistic load and contextual influences, distributing challenges equitably while amplifying control, peer connections, leadership support and an equitable culture maximizing fulfillment potential from the job experience. Sustained monitoring of objective and subjective aspects provides the insight necessary to maintain a balanced, dynamic working model optimizing this crucial driver of organizational success over time.
References
Daniels, K. (2000). Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work. Human Relations, 53(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700532006
De Sivatte, I., Olivas-Lujan, M. R., & Guadamillas, F. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of fitting different corporate entrepreneurial strategies. European Journal of International Management, 9(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2015.066667
Johari, J., Yean Tan, F., & Tjik Zulkarnain, Z. I. (2018). Authentic leadership and job satisfaction: The mediating effects of psychological conditions. Management Research Review, 41(3), 294-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2017-0032
Karanika-Murray, M., & Weyman, A. (2013). Organizational support as a predictor of work engagement and extra-role performance.International Journal of Business and Management, 8(13), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n13p95
Leblebici, D. (2012). Impact of workplace quality on employee's productivity: Case study of a bank in Turkey. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, 1(1), 38-49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289930467
Leong, P., & Crossman, J. (1996). Experiencing nature in non-restorative environments: An exploratory study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0016
Lings, I. N., & Greenley, G. E. (2005). Measuring internal market orientation. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
O'Driscoll, M. P., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Supervisor behaviors, role stressors and uncertainty as predictors of personal outcomes for subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150206
Oldham, G. R., & Brass, D. J. (1979). Employee reactions to an open‐plan office: A naturally occurring quasi‐experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392497
Oldham, G. R., & Fried, Y. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.002
Pejtersen, J. H., Feveile, H., Christensen, K. B., & Burr, H. (2011). Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan offices-a national cross sectional questionnaire survey. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 37(5), 376-382. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41342386
Pendleton, D., & Furnham, A. (2012). Leadership: All you need to know. Palgrave Macmillan.
Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., Bochner, S., Callan, V., ... & Viedge, C. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: A 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.5465/256796
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage publications.
Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356
West, M. A., & Rushton, R. (1989). Social support in the workplace. In London, H., & Terborg, J.R. (Eds.), Work motivation, theory and practice (pp. 45-61). Praeger.
Zeffane, R., & Conway, E. (2017). Emotional labor in health care settings. In Leadership and management in healthcare (pp. 46-56). Palgrave Macmillan.
Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.
Suggested Citation: Westover, J. H. (2024). The Influence of Workload and Work Environment on Employee Job Satisfaction. Human Capital Leadership Review, 12(1). doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.12.1.6
