Listen to this article:
Abstract: Retaining top talent is crucial for organizational success but many firms unknowingly drive away their best employees. This article examines the major reasons outstanding performers seek opportunities elsewhere when their needs are overlooked. Through a review of relevant literature and analyses of industry examples, key factors are identified that alienate top contributors, such as focusing solely on tasks while neglecting human well-being, lacking career growth pathways, not acknowledging great work, and poor communication practices. Practical strategies are then presented for cultivating an environment where top performers want to stay long-term, such as building relationships, balancing work and life, providing learning opportunities, regularly expressing appreciation, fostering transparency, and empowering skilled individuals. The consulting industry example highlights retention challenges overcome by firms attending to human needs like mentorship and flexibility. Overall, leadership must recognize talent retention as dependent on fulfilling innate human needs within the workplace.
As a management consultant and researcher focused on workplace excellence, one of my biggest pet peeves is seeing organizations lose their top performers due to preventable mistakes. While it's inevitable that some employees will leave for new opportunities or life changes, the best companies work hard to retain their talent. Unfortunately, many leaders unknowingly engage in behaviors that drive away their most valued people.
Today we will explore the major reasons organizations alienate standout employees, along with practical solutions to create an environment where top talent wants to stay.
Forgetting People Matter Most
A significant body of research demonstrates that employees care deeply about feeling valued as human beings, not just as cogs in the corporate machine (Branham, 2005; McKee et al., 2008). However, some managers overlook this human element in favor of a detached, transactional approach. They fail to connect with direct reports on a personal level, showing little interest in employees as whole people rather than just workers (Agars, 2004; Leiter & Maslach, 2004). When top performers notice they are treated as replaceable resources rather than individuals, they begin seeking employers who appreciate them.
Leaders must recognize that relationship building and employee well-being are just as important as task completion and profit margins (Maslach & Leiter, 1997; Saks, 2006). Regular checking in should go beyond work topics to demonstrate care about employees' lives outside the job. Surveys also indicate that flexibility supportive of work-life balance greatly reduces burnout and boosts retention (Allen, 2001; Brough & O’Driscoll, 2010). Simply acknowledging employees as human beings with needs beyond their work duties is a major factor in retaining top performers.
Lack of Growth Opportunities
Another reason prized employees leave is lack of pathways for professional growth (Jayaratne & Chess, 1984; Weng et al., 2010). All workers want to feel they are continually developing and advancing in their careers. When managers fail to provide meaningful learning, training, or promotions, top talent will seek companies committed to their long-term career progress (Ambrose et al., 2008).
Organizations lose strong performers by not investing in their futures (Juhdi et al., 2013; Wilson & Elman, 1990). Regular skill-building helps fight against boredom and plateaus that make even the best employees disengaged and open to new roles. Furthermore, managers must recognize outstanding work through promotions and increased responsibility that challenge top performers (Harter et al., 2002). Companies fostering ongoing growth keep their stars engaged and loyal in the long run.
Lack of Recognition and Appreciation
Another driving force behind talent exodus is lack of appreciation from leadership. Recognition of effort and achievement is profoundly motivating and retains valuable employees (Brief & Motowidlo, 1986; Sun et al., 2007). Praise, rewards, and expressions of gratitude fulfill innate human needs for significance and mattering that result in stronger performance, commitment, and longevity at an employer (Pratt & Ashforth, 2003; Shaw et al., 2013).
However, some managers assume top performers will inherently feel appreciated without overt communication. Not taking time to explicitly recognize and celebrate wins demotivates even all-star employees in the long run. A simple "thank you for your hard work" goes a long way. In fact, a meta-analysis found that recognition was the single strongest predictor of employee engagement and retention across industries (Cesário & Chambel, 2017). Companies serious about keeping top talent must regularly acknowledge outstanding contributors through words and actions of appreciation.
Poor Communication Practices
Transparent, open communication establishes trust vital for talent retention. However, some leaders rely on ineffective styles that exacerbate problems. For example, unclear expectations lead to errors, frustration and disengagement over time (Spector & Jex, 1998; Yballe & O'Connor, 2000). Micromanagement also infringes on autonomy and signals a lack of faith in employee skills, diminishing motivation.
Transparency builds loyalty in stars used to making independent decisions crucial to their success. Likewise, honest feedback fosters accountability and improvement (London & Smither, 2002; Pulakos & O'Leary, 2011). But vague or non-existent feedback leaves top performers confused about standing and progress. It also fails to remedy weaknesses through guided development.
The surest way for leaders to lose outstanding employees is through poor listening and one-way directives versus two-way discussions (Allen & Mueller, 2013; Somech & Drach-Zahavy, 2013). Top performers want clarity as well as a voice and will depart any workplace marred by weak communication practices over time. Strong communicators attract and retain talent through psychological safety and mutually understanding.
In today's competitive talent landscape, organizations cannot afford to squander amazing employees through preventable mistakes. Leaders must recognize the human factors like validation, growth and relationship-building that inspire top performers to stay loyal. Appreciation, transparency, empowerment and support fulfill innate needs that boost retention of stars. While some turnover is inevitable, proactive companies understand their responsibility to nourish an environment where talent wants to grow their careers long-term. With attentiveness to the factors addressed here, managers can ensure their most valuable employees don't feel compelled to seek opportunities elsewhere.
Industry Example: Consulting Firm Retention Challenges
As a management consultant myself, the consulting industry provides a salient example of retention struggles when human factors are overlooked. Consultants are high-achieving professionals constantly developing new skills. However, many firms treat them as interchangeable cogs with 80-hour work weeks and little work-life balance. Consultants rapidly burn out without validation or opportunity for more meaningful work (Kubr, 2002).
Firms lose top performers to competitors offering partnership tracks, lifestyle-supported careers, or in-house consulting roles with sustained projects (Gardiner, 2012). The constant revolving door is costly and strains client relationships. However, consultancies attentive to human needs see less attrition. For instance, large global firms implementing flex-time, mentorship, appreciation programs and customized career paths report higher retention of top-tier consultants (Higashi, 2019). By prioritizing human well-being, they keep talented professionals engaged for the long haul.
Closing Thoughts
Retaining stellar employees requires recognizing them as whole human beings rather than resources. Focusing solely on tasks and metrics overlooks innate needs for relationships, growth and validation. However, leaders who cultivate an atmosphere of support, transparency and fulfillment through the strategies discussed here will find top performers actively choosing to build lifelong careers at their organizations. A company's most valuable commodity walks out the door when talented individuals feel undervalued and stagnant. With attentiveness to human factors, even high-performing professionals will be inspired to stay.
References
Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of workplace distance and virtualness on employee outcomes: An investigation into the compensation/recovery theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02567.x
Allen, D. G. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774
Allen, T. D., & Mueller, S. L. (2013). The revolving door: Organizational commitment and voluntary turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.10.004
Ambrose, M. L., Huston, T. A., & Norman, M. A. (2008). A qualitative method for assessing source credibility in experimental management research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F160940690800700102
Branham, L. (2005). The 7 hidden reasons employees leave: How to recognize the subtle signs and act before it's too late. AMACOM.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283909
Brough, P., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2010). Organizational interventions for balancing work and home demands: An overview. Work & Stress, 24(3), 280-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.506808
Cesário, F., & Chambel, M. J. (2017). Linking organizational commitment and work engagement to employee performance. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1542
Gardiner, S. (2012). Talent management in the consulting industry. Kogan Page.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Higashi, Y. (2019, June 10). Consulting firms are challenged to retain top talent. So what can they do? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/yvonnehigashi/2019/06/10/consulting-firms-are-challenged-to-retain-top-talent-so-what-can-they-do/?sh=5e6a31f84710
Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.
Suggested Citation: Westover, J. H. (2024). Losing Top Talent: How Organizations Can Alienate Their Most Valuable Employees. Human Capital Leadership Review, 14(1). doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.14.1.14
