top of page
HCI Academy Logo.png
Foundations of Leadership 2.png
DEIB.png
Purpose.png
Cover.png
Capstone.png

Identifying and Responding to Employee Disengagement

Updated: Aug 12

By Jonathan H. Westover, PhD


Abstract: This article examines the pressing issue of employee disengagement in organizations and provides strategies for reengaging disengaged workers. It discusses research showing over 50% of U.S. employees are disengaged, costing companies hundreds of billions annually in lost productivity. Common causes of disengagement include lack of growth opportunities, poor manager relationships, misalignment between personal and company values, and inadequate compensation. Signs an employee may be disengaged include lack of enthusiasm, infrequent contributions, focusing only on core job duties, absenteeism, and avoiding social events. It then outlines approaches for re-engaging staff such as clarifying roles and expectations, developing manager capabilities, offering meaningful recognition, facilitating growth and development, and fostering an engaging culture. It analyzes how companies like Target, Google, Starbucks and Microsoft successfully implemented engagement strategies around job crafting, management training, personalized recognition, and career development. The conclusion emphasizes leadership's role in proactively addressing disengagement issues.

Employee disengagement has become a pressing issue for organizations today. Gallup estimates that over 50% of workers in the United States are disengaged from their work, costing American companies hundreds of billions of dollars each year in lost productivity (Sorenson, 2013). While disengaged employees may still show up to work each day, they lack motivation, commitment, and passion for their job. If left unaddressed, disengagement can have severe consequences for employee retention, performance, and the overall success of an organization.


As leaders, it is crucial that we understand the causes and signs of disengagement in order to take appropriate action. Today we will explore research on employee disengagement and provide practical recommendations for how organizations can identify and respond to this issue.


Contributing Factors and Signals of Disengagement


Research on Causes of Disengagement


Scholars have identified several root causes that commonly lead to employee disengagement. Research has found that lack of opportunities for growth and development within one’s role are strong predictors of disengagement (Sorenson, 2013). When employees feel stagnated in their careers and lacking in new challenges, they lose motivation.


Other common causes cited in the literature include poor relationships with managers, lack of alignment between personal values and company culture, and inadequate or unfair compensation (Harter et al., 2002). Feeling underappreciated, micromanaged, or like one’s opinions do not matter can disconnect employees from their work. A mismatch between what employees believe in and company practices and policies damages engagement as well. Compensation issues like pay that does not reflect effort levels or poor benefits also demoralize workers.


Signals that Employees May be Disengaged


There are often subtle, yet telling signs that can indicate an employee is disengaged even when they still show up each day. Being attuned to these signals allows leaders to identify disengagement in its early stages before it worsens. Some common signals identified in research include (Czarnowsky, 2008):


  • Lack of enthusiasm when discussing work or projects

  • Infrequent voluntary contributions to discussions or sharing of new ideas

  • Focusing efforts only on core job responsibilities with little initiative for additional tasks

  • High levels of absenteeism or consistently arriving late

  • Frequent complaints about duties, management, or company policies

  • Withdrawing from office social events or staying at their desk during breaks


By understanding these potential signals, leaders can have insightful conversations with employees and address any underlying issues fueling their disengagement before retention becomes a concern.


Strategies for Reengaging Employees


Clarify Employee Roles and Responsibilities


One of the simplest but most effective things organizations can do is ensure all employees have clear expectations and understanding of their roles. Taking time for job crafting conversations where managers and employees jointly clarify responsibilities, set performance goals, and discuss opportunities for growth helps alleviate ambiguity and uncertainty shown to dampen engagement. It also prevents employees from feeling unappreciated when expectations are not explicitly defined (Barrick et al., 2015).


Develop Manager Capabilities


Research consistently finds the relationship with one’s direct manager as a top predictor of engagement levels. Organizations must invest in developing strong management and coaching skills (Anderson et al., 2017). Common issues like unclear communication, lack of feedback, and micromanaging behaviors require direct attention through targeted manager trainings. Empowering managers to have regular check-ins about goals, priorities, career aspirations, and work-life fit with their teams can boost engagement.


Offer Meaningful Recognition


Feeling valued and appreciated is a core driver of engagement. While financial compensation fulfills basic needs, recognition fulfills higher-level psychological and social needs shown to deeply engage employees (Anitha, 2014). Leaders should implement regular, meaningful, and personalized recognition programs beyond annual performance reviews. Opportunities can include highlighting successes at company meetings, nominating top performers for awards, offering coaching or learning experiences as a "thank you", and acknowledging service milestones and birthdays.


Facilitate Growth and Development


One of the top reasons cited for disengagement is lack of growth opportunities. Organizations must thoughtfully design career paths and individual development plans for all employees. Offering stretch assignments, mentoring programs, tuition reimbursement, conference attendance, and rotational roles across departments gives employees a consistent sense of progression and facilitates ongoing learning shown vital for engagement (Council, 2008) . Leaders can gain insights into aspirations through career discussions and tailor development activities accordingly.


Foster an Engaging Company Culture


The effect of company culture on engagement cannot be understated. Leaders play a pivotal role in cultivating an environment of open communication, collaboration, trust, and innovation through serving as strong cultural role models. Fostaining an engaging culture also requires celebrating successes, embracing diverse viewpoints, promoting work-life balance, and encouraging community involvement. Social connection at work fulfills basic human needs shown to boost discretionary effort (Lockwood, 2007). Fun cultural events, volunteer days, and flexible remote options strengthen bonds between colleagues.


Case Studies: Successful Strategies in Action


Target Clarifying Employee Roles


Retail giant Target has successfully increased engagement through focusing on job crafting conversations between managers and team members. Store leaders guide discussions to outline key performance metrics, opportunities for growth, and how individual roles directly contribute to company strategy and values. Target finds these conversations eliminate confusion while refreshing employees' sense of purpose and importance to company goals. Since implementing job crafting talks, Target has seen retention rise and productivity gains as employees feel empowered and invested in their work (Barrick et al., 2015).


Google Developing Strong Managers


Google's People Operations division prioritizes cultivating leadership abilities as vital to company culture and engagement levels. They invest substantially in multi-day training programs teaching coaching, communication, and empathy skills shown to drive discretionary effort. Managers receive ongoing coaching and are evaluated not just on team output but also effectiveness creating an inspiring environment. Google's approach creates manager accountability for direct engagement oversight while providing tools needed. Their program serves as a exemplar for emphasizing management development's impact (Gibbs, 2014).


Starbucks Personalized Recognition


Known for its people-first culture, Starbucks focuses on tailoring recognition to individual employees. Beyond competitive compensation, baristas receive handwritten thank you cards and personal shout-outs on social media from customers and leadership. District managers visit each store monthly to acknowledge top performers. Most notably, Starbucks celebrates career milestones through “Green Apron” ceremonies - elaborate, photographed celebrations of 5, 10 and 20+ year service anniversaries that reinforce culture values. This personalized attention boosts connection and retention among baristas (Anitha, 2014).


Microsoft Career Development Opportunities


Employees consistently rate growth opportunities among the top reasons for their engagement with Microsoft. The tech giant's career development philosophy emphasizes providing every employee an ambitious, multi-year individual learning plan to acquire new skills. Programs include tuition reimbursement, mentorship rotations across departments, conference stipends, and senior-level coaching. Microsoft also launched intercompany job shadowing and its own online learning portal for employees globally. As a result, attrition has decreased as workers feel continuously challenged and invested in their futures within Microsoft (Council, 2008).


Southwest Airlines Supporting Work-Life Balance


Known for having among the most engaged workforces, Southwest Airlines emphasizes flexibility and well-being through practices like remote work flexibility, on-site fitness classes and childcare facilities. Rather than focusing narrowly on productivity metrics, Southwest evaluates managers based on promoting a low-stress, high-morale culture (Lockwood, 2007). For 35+ years Southwest maintained this unique focus on empowerment, community and work-life balance; sustaining profitable growth while keeping voluntary turnover below industry averages – demonstrating engagement’s strategic value.


Conclusion


Through understanding root causes, signals, and implementation of targeted strategies, organizations can take a proactive approach to boosting workforce engagement. The case studies highlight how clear communication, supporting manager capabilities, thoughtful recognition, career development planning, and fostering an empowering culture can reinvigorate even disengaged employees. While engagement must continually adapt to changing workforce demands, these time-tested techniques illustrate engagement’s positive influence on employee experience, retention and business results when approached strategically. Leadership plays a pivotal role through serving as cultural stewards that inspire discretionary effort. By systematically addressing disengagement issues, organizations can facilitate higher commitment, performance and satisfaction across their workforce.


References


  • Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001

  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008

  • Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A., & Courtright, S. H. (2015). Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0227

  • Czarnowsky, M. (2008). Learning’s role in employee engagement: An ASTD research study. American Society for Training and Development. https://www.td.org/reports/engagement

  • Gibbs, C. (2014). Factors impacting employee engagement: A case study of software testing teams in India. IEEE, ICSTW 2014, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2014.38

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268

  • Lockwood, N. R. (2007). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR's strategic role. HR Magazine, 52(3), 1-11.

  • Sorenson, S. (2013). How employee engagement drives growth. Gallup Business Journal. https://news.gallup.com/businessjournal/163130/employee-engagement-drives-growth.aspx

 

Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.

Suggested Citation: Westover, J. H. (2024). Identifying and Responding to Employee Disengagement. Human Capital Leadership Review, 11(2). doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.11.2.5

留言


Human Capital Leadership Review

ISSN 2693-9452 (online)

Subscription Form

HCI Academy Logo.png
Effective Teams.png
Employee Well being.png
Change Agility 2.png
cover.png
cover.png
bottom of page