In today's complex and volatile business environment, leading organizational change successfully requires more than just technical skills or decision making acumen. While competence and vision remain crucial, the human dimension of change has come to the fore. Leaders must understand not only the "what" and "why" of change initiatives but also the "who" - the people within and impacted by the organization who will determine change outcomes. At the heart of effectively navigating change with and through people lies empathy - the ability to understand others’ perspectives and experiences.
Today we will explore empathy as a central leadership competency for driving organizational change.
Defining Empathy in Leadership
Before delving into empathy's role in change management, it is important to define what is meant by the concept. At its core, empathy refers to the cognitive and affective process of understanding another person's feelings, needs and situation by perceiving from their perspective rather than one's own (Decety & Ickes, 2011). While often associated with compassion, empathy does not necessarily involve agreement with or endorsement of another's viewpoint; it is the comprehension of another's internal experience (Shapiro, 2011).
In a leadership context, empathy moves beyond intuition or good intentions to become a deliberate practice (Goleman, Boyatzis & McKee, 2013). Leaders must work to understand different groups' realities and feelings about change rather than make assumptions (Higgs & Rowland, 2011). This requires actively listening without judgment, acknowledging limitations in one's own perspective and seeking to understand diverse views even when initially uncomfortable or unclear (George, 2000). Through empathy, leaders gain insights to effectively address resistance, build support and steer complex transformations with care, nuance and wisdom.
Research Foundations: Benefits of Empathetic Leadership in Change
An abundance of research highlights empathy's importance for organizational change. Studies have linked empathetic leadership to greater employee engagement (Cianci et al., 2014), commitment (Te/Culver, 2016), willingness to embrace change (Rafferty & Restubog, 2017) and transformation outcomes (Higgs & Rowland, 2011). Conversely, a lack of empathy in the change process reduces buy-in and fosters resistance (Graeff, 1997). Three key benefits of empathetic leadership during change initiatives emerge from the literature:
1. Building Trust and Reducing Anxiety
Empathy helps leaders understand how change impacts people on an emotional level, generating needed reassurance (Amundson, 1993). It builds trust that leaders care about more than objectives alone (Caldwell, 2003). This mitigates stress and resistance, allowing people to feel heard rather than threatened (Rafferty & Restubog, 2017).
2. Gaining Insight into Diverse Perspectives
By perceiving a situation through others' eyes, empathetic leaders avoid misidentifying true concerns (Higgs & Rowland, 2011). They comprehend how change differentially affects teams and see "blind spots" in strategic plans (Cianci et al., 2014). This fosters innovative solutions addressing multiple viewpoints (George, 2000).
3. Enhancing Communication and Participation
Empathetic understanding helps craft clear, tailored change messages that resonate emotionally (Rafferty & Restubog, 2017). It builds two-way dialogue where people feel involved in shaping strategies, rather than forced to comply (Graeff, 1997). As a result, change processes garner richer input and wider participation (Amundson, 1993).
These research themes validate that empathy is not a "soft" skill but a pragmatic leadership approach with concrete impacts on organizational transformations. Empathetic leaders gain advantaged insight, gain commitment and smooth disruptions to achieve change aims.
Cultivating Empathy through Active Practices
While some individuals seem naturally empathetic, research indicates it is also a trainable competency (Konrath et al., 2011). Leaders can develop and apply specific practices to enhance their empathetic skills both individually and organizationally.
Listening with an Open Mind: Actively and deeply listening to understand rather than reply helps gain new perspectives (Goleman, Boyatzis & McKee, 2013). Leaders should carve out time, avoid assumptions and discern feelings behind words (George, 2000). Reflective questioning fosters insight into silent "voices" and concerns typically unheard.
Learning About Others' Realities: Empathy starts with curiosity about diverse experiences (Shapiro, 2011). Leaders can consult a cross-section of stakeholders, conduct empathy interviews and immerse themselves in different environments to comprehend realities unlike their own (Goleman, et al., 2013). Storytelling and data highlight varied impacts of change.
Framing Fair Feedback Sensitively: Providing candid yet considerate feedback requires empathetically weighing another's emotions and situation (Te/Culver, 2016). Feedback framing it constructively and finding a connection builds trust in developmental goals.
Modeling Vulnerability and Self-Awareness: Authentic two-way empathy emerges from leaders' willingness to acknowledge limitations and openly learn with humility (George, 2000). Admitting "I don't know" invites others to impart their wisdom too.
These research-based practices apply empathy handfully in leadership. Yet to affect real change, application within specific organizational contexts remains crucial.
Practical Applications within Industries
Empathy's value differs across industries based on workplace cultures, structures and transformations. Two examples illuminate tangible integration of empathetic skills for organizational change management:
Healthcare Reform through an Empathetic Lens
In today's complex healthcare systems, cost efficiencies and quality care demand constant reinvention (Castelló et al., 2019). Yet frontline clinical staff know patients intimately and grapple with reform impacts daily. Empathetic hospital CEOs actively learn caregivers' emotional experiences through rounding together (Goleman, et al., 2013). They address physicians' anxieties over regulations through open forums. As a result, even controversial reforms gain physician champions reducing resistance (Amundson, 1993). Empathy becomes integral to quality-centered, sustainable transformations in this sensitive industry.
Technology Innovation through Cross-Functional Teams
Rapid technological shifts require software firms to repeatedly reinvent themselves (Moe & Šmite, 2019). However, diverse functions like engineering, marketing and finance experience changes uniquely. An empathetic tech VP forms cross-team “laboratories” where colleagues perceive innovations through others' roles (Konrath et al., 2011). These cultivate empathy between functions leading to more holistic, team-driven solutions rather inter-departmental conflict (George, 2000). Consequently, innovative strategies emerge through understanding multiple viewpoints.
These examples highlight that empathy strengthens change results when authentically anchored to organizational realities and industry human dynamics. Leaders ensure research-validated skills benefit the people driving transformations.
Conclusion
In navigating today's volatile business environment, technical competencies alone no longer suffice for leaders to implement change successfully. As the human dimensions of change take precedence, empathy has emerged a central leadership ability. Through cultivating understanding of varied stakeholders' situations, empathetic leaders can build trust, foster two-way participation and gain multi-faceted insights crucial to change guidance. As evidenced through research and practical examples, leaders who apply empathy practically within industry contexts can smooth disruptions, address resistance more proactively and enhance transformation outcomes. While no simple fix, empathy strengthens the often complex and unpredictable human side of organizational change when authentically integrated as a core leadership practice.
References
Amundson, N. E. (1993). Managing change and transition. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED357781.pdf
Caldwell, R. (2003). Models of change agency: A fourfold classification. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00270
Castelló, M., Pardo, C., Saldaña, S., & Munduate, L. (2019). Leading organizational change towards sustainability: Employees’ uncertainty, turnover intentions and well-being. Sustainability, 11(17), Article 4556. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174556
Cianci, A. M., Hannah, S. T., Roberts, R. P., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on followers' ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: An experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.001
Decety, J., & Ickes, W. (Eds.). (2011). The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press.
George, B. (2000). Six practices of authentic leaders. Strategic Finance, 82(3), 17.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.
Graeff, C. L. (1997). Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90014-X
Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2011). What does it take to implement change successfully? A study of the behaviors of successful change leaders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 309–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886311404556
Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395
Moe, N. B., & Šmite, D. (2019). Understanding a lack of trust in global software engineering: A multiple-case study. Information and Software Technology, 111, Article 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.04.008
Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2017). Why do employees deviate from their leaders? The role of employee psychological contracts. Human Relations, 70(7), 806–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716677430
Shapiro, J. (2011). Walking a mile in their patients' shoes: Empathy and othering in medical students' education. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-6-10
Te/Culver, D. M. (2016). The impact of exchange relationships, authentic leadership, and psychological safety on employee voice and performance (Order No. 10154658) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Jonathan H. Westover, PhD is Chief Academic & Learning Officer (HCI Academy); Chair/Professor, Organizational Leadership (UVU); OD Consultant (Human Capital Innovations). Read Jonathan Westover's executive profile here.
